
2025 Latest Prep4sureExam MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I PDF Dumps and MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ysJGTImQpAnR51yt35MMuWBiE6gL995U
Our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam materials are flexible and changeable, and the servide provide by our company is quite specific. Our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I test questions have been following the pace of digitalization, constantly refurbishing, and adding new things. I hope you can feel the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam prep sincerely serve customers. We also attach great importance to the opinions of our customers. As long as you make reasonable recommendations for our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I test material, we will give you free updates to the system's benefits. We have always advocated customer first. If you use our learning materials to achieve your goals, we will be honored. MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam prep look forward to meeting you.
Many exam candidates feel hampered by the shortage of effective MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I practice materials, and the thick books and similar materials causing burden for you. Serving as indispensable choices on your way of achieving success especially during this exam, more than 98 percent of candidates pass the exam with our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I practice materials and all of former candidates made measurable advance and improvement. All MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I practice materials fall within the scope of this exam for your information.
>> Reliable Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Real Test <<
Review the products offered by us by downloading their free demos and compare them with the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I study material offered in online course free and vendors' files. You will find our products the better than our competitors such as exam collection and others. The excellent quality of our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I content, their relevance with the actual exam needs and their interactive and simple format will prove them superior and quite pertinent to your needs and requirements.
Topic | Details |
---|---|
Topic 1 |
|
Topic 2 |
|
Topic 3 |
|
Topic 4 |
|
Topic 5 |
|
Topic 6 |
|
Topic 7 |
|
Topic 8 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 149
Version 3.0.1 of a REST API implementation represents time values in PST time using ISO 8601 hh:mm:ss format. The API implementation needs to be changed to instead represent time values in CEST time using ISO 8601 hh:mm:ss format. When following the semver.org semantic versioning specification, what version should be assigned to the updated API implementation?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Correct Answer : 4.0.0
*****************************************
As per semver.org semantic versioning specification:
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the:
- MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes.
- MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner.
- PATCH version when you make backwards compatible bug fixes.
As per the scenario given in the question, the API implementation is completely changing its behavior. Although the format of the time is still being maintained as hh:mm:ss and there is no change in schema w.r.t format, the API will start functioning different after this change as the times are going to come completely different.
Example: Before the change, say, time is going as 09:00:00 representing the PST. Now on, after the change, the same time will go as 18:00:00 as Central European Summer Time is 9 hours ahead of Pacific Time.
>> This may lead to some uncertain behavior on API clients depending on how they are handling the times in the API response. All the API clients need to be informed that the API functionality is going to change and will return in CEST format. So, this considered as a MAJOR change and the version of API for this new change would be 4.0.0
NEW QUESTION # 150
A retail company is using an Order API to accept new orders. The Order API uses a JMS queue to submit orders to a backend order management service. The normal load for orders is being handled using two (2) CloudHub workers, each configured with 0.2 vCore. The CPU load of each CloudHub worker normally runs well below 70%. However, several times during the year the Order API gets four times (4x) the average number of orders. This causes the CloudHub worker CPU load to exceed 90% and the order submission time to exceed 30 seconds. The cause, however, is NOT the backend order management service, which still responds fast enough to meet the response SLA for the Order API. What is the MOST resource-efficient way to configure the Mule application's CloudHub deployment to help the company cope with this performance challenge?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Correct Answer : Use a horizontal CloudHub autoscaling policy that triggers on CPU utilization greater than 70%
*****************************************
The scenario in the question is very clearly stating that the usual traffic in the year is pretty well handled by the existing worker configuration with CPU running well below 70%. The problem occurs only "sometimes" occasionally when there is spike in the number of orders coming in.
So, based on above, We neither need to permanently increase the size of each worker nor need to permanently increase the number of workers. This is unnecessary as other than those "occasional" times the resources are idle and wasted.
We have two options left now. Either to use horizontal Cloudhub autoscaling policy to automatically increase the number of workers or to use vertical Cloudhub autoscaling policy to automatically increase the vCore size of each worker.
Here, we need to take two things into consideration:
1. CPU
2. Order Submission Rate to JMS Queue
>> From CPU perspective, both the options (horizontal and vertical scaling) solves the issue. Both helps to bring down the usage below 90%.
>> However, If we go with Vertical Scaling, then from Order Submission Rate perspective, as the application is still being load balanced with two workers only, there may not be much improvement in the incoming request processing rate and order submission rate to JMS queue. The throughput would be same as before. Only CPU utilization comes down.
>> But, if we go with Horizontal Scaling, it will spawn new workers and adds extra hand to increase the throughput as more workers are being load balanced now. This way we can address both CPU and Order Submission rate.
Hence, Horizontal CloudHub Autoscaling policy is the right and best answer.
NEW QUESTION # 151
A retail company with thousands of stores has an API to receive data about purchases and insert it into a single database. Each individual store sends a batch of purchase data to the API about every 30 minutes. The API implementation uses a database bulk insert command to submit all the purchase data to a database using a custom JDBC driver provided by a data analytics solution provider. The API implementation is deployed to a single CloudHub worker. The JDBC driver processes the data into a set of several temporary disk files on the CloudHub worker, and then the data is sent to an analytics engine using a proprietary protocol. This process usually takes less than a few minutes. Sometimes a request fails. In this case, the logs show a message from the JDBC driver indicating an out-of-file-space message. When the request is resubmitted, it is successful. What is the best way to try to resolve this throughput issue?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Correct Answer : Increase the size of the CloudHub worker(s)
*****************************************
The key details that we can take out from the given scenario are:
>> API implementation uses a database bulk insert command to submit all the purchase data to a database
>> JDBC driver processes the data into a set of several temporary disk files on the CloudHub worker
>> Sometimes a request fails and the logs show a message indicating an out-of-file-space message Based on above details:
>> Both auto-scaling options does NOT help because we cannot set auto-scaling rules based on error messages. Auto-scaling rules are kicked-off based on CPU/Memory usages and not due to some given error or disk space issues.
>> Increasing the number of CloudHub workers also does NOT help here because the reason for the failure is not due to performance aspects w.r.t CPU or Memory. It is due to disk-space.
>> Moreover, the API is doing bulk insert to submit the received batch data. Which means, all data is handled by ONE worker only at a time. So, the disk space issue should be tackled on "per worker" basis. Having multiple workers does not help as the batch may still fail on any worker when disk is out of space on that particular worker.
Therefore, the right way to deal this issue and resolve this is to increase the vCore size of the worker so that a new worker with more disk space will be provisioned.
NEW QUESTION # 152
How are an API implementation, API client, and API consumer combined to invoke and process an API?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Correct Answer : The API consumer creates an API client, which sends API invocations to an API such that they are processed by an API implementation
*****************************************
Terminology:
>> API Client - It is a piece of code or program the is written to invoke an API
>> API Consumer - An owner/entity who owns the API Client. API Consumers write API clients.
>> API - The provider of the API functionality. Typically an API Instance on API Manager where they are managed and operated.
>> API Implementation - The actual piece of code written by API provider where the functionality of the API is implemented. Typically, these are Mule Applications running on Runtime Manager.
NEW QUESTION # 153
Refer to the exhibit.
What is a valid API in the sense of API-led connectivity and application networks?
A) Java RMI over TCP
B) Java RMI over TCP
C) CORBA over HOP
D) XML over UDP
Answer: B
Explanation:
Correct Answe r: XML over HTTP
*****************************************
>> API-led connectivity and Application Networks urge to have the APIs on HTTP based protocols for building most effective APIs and networks on top of them.
>> The HTTP based APIs allow the platform to apply various varities of policies to address many NFRs
>> The HTTP based APIs also allow to implement many standard and effective implementation patterns that adhere to HTTP based w3c rules.
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
NEW QUESTION # 154
......
With MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I test training materials of Prep4sureExam, you will own the key to pass MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam, which will make you develop better in IT. All of this just need you trust us, trust in Prep4sureExam, and trust in MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I test training materials. Our training material of MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam is absolutely real and reliable. What's more, the passing rate of MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I test is as high as 100%.
Valid Test MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Experience: https://www.prep4sureexam.com/MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I-dumps-torrent.html
What's more, part of that Prep4sureExam MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ysJGTImQpAnR51yt35MMuWBiE6gL995U
Tags: Reliable MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Real Test, Valid Test MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Experience, MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Valid Test Braindumps, Exam MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Introduction, MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Free Test Questions